Nuclear TigeRES vs Atreides: Result & Stats
On Saturday, 18 July 2026, Nuclear TigeRES (NT) faced Atreides in a best-of-3 at European Pro League Series 8. The tie sits in Playoffs of a C-tier event with $20,000 in prize money on the line. Over the past six months Nuclear TigeRES have won 60% of their 52 matches; Atreides have won 55% of 62. Recent form reads 2–3 for Nuclear TigeRES and 0–5 for Atreides. On the map pool, Nuclear TigeRES's Anubis stands out — 18–6 across their last 24 plays on it. They have met once before, and Atreides won it. Atreides won the series 2–0.
Map Veto
who banned and picked whatA team playing its own pick tends to win more often than its overall form suggests — which is why we do not price the per-map betting markets before the veto is known.
Team Comparison
Last 180 days · 52 vs 62 matchesMap Pool
Nuclear TigeRES vs Atreides — W–L per mapCounted from each team's recent finished matches: 134 maps for Nuclear TigeRES, 94 for Atreides. A strong map here often decides the veto — and a team playing its own pick tends to overperform its overall form.
Lineups
K/D and average damage per round (ADR) over each player's last three months of matches.
Pre-match odds
Nuclear TigeRES
AtreidesThe price at kick-off (10:26 AM) — what our prediction was graded against. Affiliate links — we may earn a commission. Gamble responsibly: resources.
Line Movement
pre-match prices only · Nuclear TigeRES implied %CSGOEmpire opened Nuclear TigeRES at 1.14 (81% implied). By kick-off the price was 1.17 (79%) over 10h of pricing — the line has barely moved.
More CS2 Predictions
all matches →FAQ
When was Nuclear TigeRES vs Atreides?
The best-of-3 match was played on Saturday, 18 July 2026, part of European Pro League Series 8. Atreides won 2–0.
What maps were played in Nuclear TigeRES vs Atreides?
The best-of-3 was played on Mirage (Atreides's pick), Ancient (Nuclear TigeRES's pick).
Predictions are informational analysis, not betting advice. Probabilities are market-implied (vig removed) · methodology & track record on the accuracy page.